Commentary: Common Blunders in Texas Supreme Court Briefs

, Texas Lawyer


The majority of briefs on the merits submitted to the Texas Supreme Court are well argued, well supported and finely tuned. But the court also sees its fair share of sloppy writing and incoherent arguments, writes Martha Lackritz. With some thought and planning, lawyers can improve their writing and become better advocates for their clients. The following list of common blunders is in no particular order. It represents my views alone, not that of the judge for whom I work or of the court.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Continue to Lexis Advance®

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at

What's being said

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202509651777

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.